- #SILVERSTACK SHOWS NO FILES TO COPY VERIFICATION#
- #SILVERSTACK SHOWS NO FILES TO COPY SOFTWARE#
- #SILVERSTACK SHOWS NO FILES TO COPY PROFESSIONAL#
Workflow Considerations With Differing Camera ModelsĪs it does for all offload settings, the offload wizard automatically restores the chosen renaming pattern from the previous offload session. In addition, the selected card name is set as reel name for each clip in Silverstack’s library and as bin name in the library’s folder structure. The new name will show up as a clip name in Silverstack and as a file name on all copy destinations. Optional: Individual clip number (starts for each offload with 1).Original file name without extension, e.g.Set a card name and a renaming pattern in the offload wizardĪccording to the selected renaming pattern, Silverstack generates unique clip names using these components: In addition to your usual offload settings, make sure you set an individual bin name for the card you are offloading in the “ingest” section (e.g., A001) and a renaming pattern in the “Copy and Verify” section.
#SILVERSTACK SHOWS NO FILES TO COPY VERIFICATION#
It integrates seamlessly with other Silverstack features like verification or cascading copy and makes the renaming process transparent by referencing both original and new file names in the resources panel. During the copying process, the file and clip names can be individualized by a selectable pattern, resulting in consistent and unique file names on the offload destinations while leaving the original files on the camera card untouched. Silverstack 8.0 introduced a file renaming option in the offload wizard that provides a transparent and easy solution for these scenarios. Wouldn’t it be nice if Silverstack could help you take care of ambiguous file names in your usual offloading workflow and with minimal effort? File Renaming on Offload With Silverstack
#SILVERSTACK SHOWS NO FILES TO COPY SOFTWARE#
In any case, you lose the information that the OCFs were renamed, and you need to perform additional work steps with different software components. On the other hand, batch renaming the first backup of a card interrupts the workflow of copying to multiple destinations, editing metadata, QC’ing, and transcoding. Batch renaming files on the original card itself is a bad idea: you alter the OCF and have no backup if something goes wrong. Some users try to resolve the ambiguity of file and clip names using batch-renaming scripts or dedicated applications, adding custom pre- or postfixes to make the file names unique. Therefore, the flexibility of these camera systems comes at a high price.
The ambiguity of one file name referencing multiple clips in a project impairs complexity: you (and everyone in the post process) need to be extra-thoughtful when offloading, organizing, and processing them to ensure no mix-ups – even more, when sharing proxies and conforming. Ending up with countless cards labeled No Name, each containing identical clip names (like 0001.mp4, 0002.mp4), or multiple folders containing identically named files on a single card, can be a nerve-racking result.
#SILVERSTACK SHOWS NO FILES TO COPY PROFESSIONAL#
But many consumer cameras don’t come with the elaborate file naming mechanisms of professional camera systems. There are a lot of situations where shooting with action cameras or DSLRs allow stunning perspectives and prevent expensive gear from possible damage. Have You Ever Shot With Cameras That Always Create the Same Filenames?
0 kommentar(er)
